What must be proven for an act to be classified as exploitation of a disabled adult?

To classify an act as exploitation of a disabled adult, it is essential to demonstrate that the suspect's intent was specifically to deprive the individual of their assets. This encapsulates the core of exploitation, which revolves around the abuse of trust and the manipulation of the vulnerable status of the disabled adult for selfish gain.

Exploitation often involves actions taken to unlawfully use someone's funds or property, and the intent to deprive underscores the predatory nature of the act. Establishing that the suspect purposely aimed to take away the disabled individual's resources adds a vital layer of understanding regarding how exploitation diverges from legitimate interactions or even negligent actions, which do not carry the same malicious intent.

Other options speak to different contexts or elements that do not directly define exploitation as legal terminology necessitates. For instance, the lawful custodian's use of funds doesn't inherently imply exploitation if done within the scope of their duties. Similarly, intending to benefit the disabled person may refer to benevolent actions rather than exploitation. Additionally, the use of physical force might indicate theft or robbery, which applies a different legal standard. Thus, the emphasis on the suspect's intention to deprive the victim of assets accurately captures the essence of exploitative actions.